Articles Vol. 3, No. 2 (2025)
Yusmaneli Yusmaneli, Fathurrahmad Fathurrahmad, Ayu Raihani
Lembaga Mitra Solusi Teknologi Informasi (LMSTI)
STMIK Indonesia Banda Aceh
Universitas Syiah Kuala
10.58477/dj.v3i2.320 Published: 2025-07-31
Abstract

This design study develops a structured pedagogical framework positioning generative AI as a verification-dependent learning support for Indonesian 4th-5th grade students. The framework implements a sequential process (Prompt → Verify → Diagnose → Revise → Reflect → Transfer) bounded by ethical guidelines and local cultural contexts. The research addresses student bypassing of initial reasoning, absence of age-appropriate AI literacy assessment, digital access disparities, insufficient verification practices, and potential erosion of academic integrity. Using a quasi-experimental design (n≈200 across 4 schools; 12 weeks), the study compares an AI-integrated curriculum with conventional instruction, controlling for pre-test performance, socioeconomic indicators, and gender. The intervention balances AI-mediated learning (25-35%) with analog activities (65-75%) to preserve direct cognitive engagement. Assessment instruments include reading comprehension measures, contextual mathematics problems, a four-dimensional AI literacy rubric, interaction logs, classroom observations, motivation scales, and verification records. Anticipated outcomes include normalized learning gains of 0.35-0.45 in reading and 0.30-0.40 in mathematics; advancement to Level 3 AI literacy; reduction in AI dependence from 60% to 35-40%; increased higher-order questioning; and equitable outcomes across settings through offline resource distribution. The theoretical framework proposes that prompt quality influences learning outcomes through verification practices, metacognitive awareness, and ethical understanding. Implementation challenges include novelty effects, variable teacher adherence, technology access inconsistencies, and ethical standards application. The research aims to shift elementary AI education from answer retrieval toward evidence-based inquiry with ethical awareness.

How to Cite

How to Cite

Yusmaneli, Y., Fathurrahmad, F., & Raihani, A. (2025). A Hybrid “Probabilistic Scaffold” Model for Enhancing Reading Literacy, Numeracy, and AI Literacy among Indonesian Primary School Students. Design Journal, 3(2), 78-98. https://doi.org/10.58477/dj.v3i2.320
Yusmaneli Yusmaneli

Lembaga Mitra Solusi Teknologi Informasi (LMSTI)

Junior Researcher, Research and Publication Division, Lembaga Mitra Solusi Teknologi Informasi (LMSTI), Banda Aceh City, Aceh Province, Indonesia

Fathurrahmad Fathurrahmad

STMIK Indonesia Banda Aceh

Informatics Management Study Program, STMIK Indonesia Banda Aceh, Banda Aceh City, Aceh Province, Indonesia

Ayu Raihani

Universitas Syiah Kuala

Physics Education Study Program, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Universitas Syiah Kuala, Banda Aceh City, Aceh Province, Indonesia

Issue Vol. 3 No. 2 (2025)
SectionArticles
DOI10.58477/dj.v3i2.320
Publication Date2025-07-31
Pages78-98
  • Ali, M. A., & Mughari, S. (2025). Effect of AI literacy on online information search competencies among medical students in Pakistan. Information Development, 41(3), 811-824. Information Development. https://doi.org/10.1177/02666669241299765
  • Al-Qerem, W., Eberhardt, J., Jarab, A., Al Bawab, A. Q., Hammad, A., Alasmari, F., ... & Al-Beool, S. (2023). Exploring knowledge, attitudes, and practices towards artificial intelligence among health professions’ students in Jordan. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 23(1), 288. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-023-02403-0
  • Alshehri, B. (2023). Pedagogical paradigms in the AI era: Insights from Saudi educators on the long-term implications of AI integration in classroom teaching. IJESA, 2(8), 159-180. https://doi.org/10.59992/ijesa.2023.v2n8p7
  • Anggreni, P., Wulandari, T., Winata, E. Y., Irmawati, I., Wali, M., Arifin, N. Y., ... & Asrial, A. (2023). PENDIDIKAN UNTUK SEMUA: Menemukan Solusi Inklusif dalam Lingkungan Pembelajaran. Yayasan Literasi Sains Indonesia.
  • Biagini, G. (2024). Assessing the assessments: Toward a multidimensional approach to AI literacy. Media Education, 15(1), 91-101. https://doi.org/10.36253/me-15831
  • Brummelen, J., Heng, T., & Tabunshchyk, V. (2021). Teaching tech to talk: K-12 conversational artificial intelligence literacy curriculum and development tools. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 35(17), 15655-15663. https://doi.org/10.1609/aaai.v35i17.17844
  • Chan, K., & Zary, N. (2019). Applications and challenges of implementing artificial intelligence in medical education: Integrative review. JMIR Medical Education, 5(1), e13930. https://doi.org/10.2196/13930
  • Damanhuri, & Wali, M. (2024). How does the influence of moral values affect children's use of Roblox in character education? International Journal Education and Computer Studies (IJECS), 4(3), 130-142. https://doi.org/10.35870/ijecs.v4i3.3627
  • Druga, S., Vu, S., Likhith, E., & Qiu, T. (2019). Inclusive AI literacy for kids around the world. Proceedings of FabLearn 2019, 104-111. https://doi.org/10.1145/3311890.3311904
  • Karataş, F., Eriçok, B., & Tanrikulu, L. (2024). Reshaping curriculum adaptation in the age of artificial intelligence: Mapping teachers' AI‐driven curriculum adaptation patterns. British Educational Research Journal, 51(1), 154-180. https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.4068
  • Kim, S., Kim, S., Kim, H., & Lee, Y. (2025). Integrating artificial intelligence into medical curricula: Perspectives of faculty and students in South Korea. Korean Journal of Medical Education, 37(1), 65-70. https://doi.org/10.3946/kjme.2025.324
  • Lee, J., Wu, A., Li, D., & Kulasegaram, K. (2021). Artificial intelligence in undergraduate medical education: A scoping review. Academic Medicine, 96(11S), S62-S70. https://doi.org/10.1097/acm.0000000000004291
  • Lee, Y., Kim, S., Lee, Y., Kim, H., Seo, S., Kim, H., … & Kim, K. (2023). Defining medical AI competencies for medical school graduates: Outcomes of a Delphi survey and medical student/educator questionnaire of South Korean medical schools. Academic Medicine, 99(5), 524-533. https://doi.org/10.1097/acm.0000000000005618
  • Moldt, J., Festl‐Wietek, T., Mamlouk, A., Nieselt, K., Fuhl, W., & Herrmann‐Werner, A. (2023). Chatbots for future docs: Exploring medical students' attitudes and knowledge towards artificial intelligence and medical chatbots. Medical Education Online, 28(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/10872981.2023.2182659
  • Nurbaya, Azwar, I., Emiliasari, R. N., Susilawati, Dewi, S. L., Rahmasari, S. M., Wali, M., Nasution, A., Inayah, S., Angraini, L. M., Kania, N., Pamungkas, M. D., Supriyadi, E., & Widyastika, D. (2023). Inovasi Pembelajaran. CV. Edupedia Publisher.
  • Park, W., & Kwon, H. (2023). Implementing artificial intelligence education for middle school technology education in Republic of Korea. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 34(1), 109-135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-023-09812-2
  • Rainey, C., O'Regan, T., Matthew, J., Skelton, E., Woznitza, N., Chu, K., … & Malamateniou, C. (2021). Beauty is in the AI of the beholder: Are we ready for the clinical integration of artificial intelligence in radiography? An exploratory analysis of perceived AI knowledge, skills, confidence, and education perspectives of UK radiographers. Frontiers in Digital Health, 3. https://doi.org/10.3389/fdgth.2021.739327
  • Rathore, A., Sultana, N., Zareen, S., & Ahmed, A. (2023). Artificial intelligence and curriculum prospects for elementary school. Pakistan Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 11(4). https://doi.org/10.52131/pjhss.2023.v11i4.1909
  • Sukmawati, W., & Wahjusaputri, S. (2024). Integrating RADEC model and AI to enhance science literacy: Student perspectives. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 10(6), 3080-3089. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v10i6.7557
  • Weidener, L., & Fischer, M. (2023). Artificial intelligence teaching as part of medical education: Qualitative analysis of expert interviews. JMIR Medical Education, 9, e46428. https://doi.org/10.2196/46428.
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Article Statistics
Download data is not yet available.