Abstract
The dissemination of hoaxes in the digital era has expanded from social domains to private corporate sectors, posing serious threats to brand reputation and industrial relations. This community service (PKM) activity aims to educate and elevate the legal awareness of employees at PT. Mitsubishi Dipo Medan regarding the multi-layered legal consequences of spreading false news, encompassing cyber criminal law, civil law, and labor law. The community partners are employees across two major branches of PT. Mitsubishi Dipo Medan, namely the Sisingamangaraja Branch and the Krakatau Branch. Program implementation methods included interactive lectures, judicial case studies, and legal dispute simulations, evaluated via pre-test and post-test questionnaires aligned with the Ministry of Communication and Informatics’ digital literacy pillars. The results demonstrated a significant 109.4% increase in the participants' legal comprehension. The deep legal analysis examines the implications of the 2024 EIT Law amendment, the annulment of false news provisions in Law 1/1946 by the Constitutional Court through Decision Number 78/PUU-XXI/2023, the enforcement of the New Criminal Code (Law 1/2023) in 2026, and the application of civil vicarious liability doctrines under Article 1367 of the Indonesian Civil Code. The outcome of this program is the formation of a corporate internal risk mitigation framework through recommendations for updating Company Regulations and implementing Non-Disclosure Agreements to protect the automotive business stability of the partner.
How to Cite
| Issue | Vol. 5 No. 1 (2026) |
| Section | Articles |
| DOI | 10.58477/pasai.v5i1.427 |
| Publication Date | 2026-06-30 |
| Pages | 40-47 |
- Admin PT. Dipo. (2021). alamat PT. Dipo. https://www.dipo.co.id/. https://www.dipo.co.id/network
- Advokasi, L. K. dan I. P. (2024). (LeIP) Revocation of “Fake News” Provisions is (Hopefully) Not Fake. https://leip.or.id/. https://leip.or.id/press-release-revocation-of-fake-news-provisions-is-hopefully-not-fake/
- akset. (2024). Constitutional Court Decision on Articles Relating to Defamation and False News. https://aksetlaw.com/. https://aksetlaw.com/news-event/newsflash/constitutional-court-decision-on-articles-relating-to-defamation-and-false-news/
- Anita Sari. (2025). Bocor Rahasia Perusahaan: Apa Batasan Karyawan dalam KUHAP & UU ITE? Pahami Batasannya! https://yaplegal.id/. https://yaplegal.id/blog/bocor-rahasia-perusahaan-apa-batasan-karyawan-dalam-kuhap-uu-ite-pahami-batasannya
- Antonyo Hartono Tanujaya, et al. (2025). Analisis Sanksi Pidana terhadap Pelaku Penyebaran Hoaks di Media Sosial berdasarkan UU ITE dan KUHP. Journal Humaniora: Jurnal Hukum dan Ilmu Sosial, 3(2), 137–143.
- Ariesta Amanda, dan D. N. (2022). PENINGKATAN KOMPETENSI LITERASI DAN KECAKAPAN DIGITAL HIMPUNAN MAHASISWA ADMINISTRASI PUBLIK (HMAP) UNU PURWOKERTO. Jurnal Abdimas Bina Bangsa, 3(2), 363–370. https://doi.org/DOI Issue : 10.46306/jabb.v3i2
- Aufa, H., & Dan Lubis, F. (2025). PHK Tidak Sesuai Prosedur Berdasarkan UU No. 13 Thn 2003 Tentang Ketenagakerjaan Jo UU No. 6 Thn 2023 Tentang Cipta Kerja Perspektif Maqashid Syariah (Studi Kasus PTSN No. 32/Pdt.G/2019/Pn Bau). Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis, 6(5). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.56370/jhlg.v6i5.1458
- BPJS Ketenagakerjaan. (2025). Bolehkah Perusahaan Melakukan PHK Secara Mendadak? https://www.bpjsketenagakerjaan.go.id/. https://www.bpjsketenagakerjaan.go.id/artikel/18530/artikel-bolehkah-perusahaan-melakukan-phk-secara-mendadak
- Bratadharma, A. (2023). Jenis PHK Berdasarkan UU Cipta Kerja-kerja. https://disnaker.kebumenkab.go.id/. https://disnaker.kebumenkab.go.id/index.php/web/post/3514/jenis-phk-berdasarkan-uu-cipta-kerja
- Fakultas Hukum Untar. (2025). Penyebaran Berita Bohong (Hoax) Bisa Berakibat Hukuman Pidana. https://fh.untar.ac.id/. https://fh.untar.ac.id/2025/03/14/penyebaran-berita-bohong-hoax-bisa-berakibat-hukuman-pidana/
- HRIS, K. (2026). 10 Alasan PHK Resmi & Sah Berdasarkan UU Cipta Kerja Terbaru. https://kantorku.id/. https://kantorku.id/blog/alasan-phk/
- Humaira Aliya. (2026). Semua yang Perlu Kamu Ketahui Tentang Non-Disclosure Agreement (NDA). https://glints.com/id. https://glints.com/id/lowongan/nda-adalah/
- Ihda Aulia Rahmah. (2023). PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN PERUSAHAAN ATAS PERBUATAN MELANGGAR HUKUM YANG DILAKUKAN KARYAWAN (STUDI KASUS ANTAM VS BUDI SAID). https://pdb-lawfirm.id/. https://pdb-lawfirm.id/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/Working-Paper-PDB-Law-Firm-Edisi-11-Oktober2023_compressed.pdf
- Iskandar D.P. (2017). Benarkah Perusahaan Bertanggung Jawab Atas Kesalahan Pekerjanya? https://bplawyers.co.id/. https://bplawyers.co.id/2017/08/28/benarkah-perusahaan-bertanggung-jawab-atas-semua-kesalahan-pekerjanya/
- Lembaga Kajian dan Advokasi Independensi Peradilan (LeIP). (2024). [LeIP] Putusan MK No. 78/PUU-XX1/2023: Penghapusan Pasal “Berita Bohong” Yang (Semoga) Menjadi Kenyataan. https://leip.or.id/. https://leip.or.id/rilis-media-putusan-mk-no-78-puu-xx1-2023-penghapusan-pasal-berita-bohong-yang-semoga-menjadi-kenyataan/
- Mhd. Arief Akbar Surahman. (2021). Tanggungjawab Perusahaan Atas Perbuatan Karyawan Yang Mengakibatkan Kerugian Terhadap Orang Lain (Studi Putusan NO. 206/PDT/2014/PT.SBY)”. IURIS STUDIA: Jurnal Kajian Hukum, 2(3), 613–623.
- Nazif, I. (2025). Apa akibat hukum jika perusahaan melakukan PHK tanpa mengikuti prosedur UU Ketenagakerjaan? https://yaplegal.id/. https://yaplegal.id/faq/apa-akibat-hukum-jika-perusahaan-melakukan-phk-tanpa-mengikuti-prosedur-uu-ketenagakerjaan
- Nur Rizkiah Hasanah, et al. (2025). PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN ASPEK HUKUM KETENAGAKERJAAN YANG DILAKUKAN OLEH KARYAWAN TERHADAP PERUSAHAAN (STUDI KASUS PUTUSAN NO.42/PID.B/2025/PN BANJAR) LEGAL LIABILITY IN THE ASPECT OF LABOR LAW COMMITTED BY EMPLOYEES TOWARD THE COMPANY (A CASE STUDY OF DECISION. Rewang Rencang : Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis, 6(5), 1–24.
- Rahmat Giling, et al. (2026). PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN PIDANA TERHADAP PENYEBAR BERITA BOHONG (HOAX) DALAM PERSPEKTIF HUKUM PIDANA INDONESIA PASCA PEMBARUAN KUHP DAN UU ITE. BERAJAH JOURNAL, 6(1), 28–35. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.47353/bj.v2i2.80
- Rasha Nazifa Muhtar. (2025). Penerapan Asas Vicarious Liability dalam Perbuatan Melawan Hukum pada Hubungan Kerja: Studi Kasus Menurut Hukum Indonesia dan Hukum Inggris. Lex Patrimonium, 4(3), 1–25. https://scholarhub.ui.ac.id/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1192&context=lexpatri
- Rifdah Rudi. (2024). Di-PHK karena Kesalahan Berat, Ini Hukumnya. https://www.hukumonline.com/. https://www.hukumonline.com/klinik/a/di-phk-karena-kesalahan-berat--ini-hukumnya-lt4e8e67959c64c/
- Sekar Ayu Dita dan Atik Winanti. (2023). Analisis Asas Vicarious Liability dalam Pertanggungjawaban Pengganti atas Perbuatan Melawan Hukum Pegawai Bank. Jurnal USM Law Review, 6(2), 526–542.
- Sovia Hasanah. (2018). Arti Berita Bohong dan Menyesatkan dalam UU ITE. https://www.hukumonline.com/. https://www.hukumonline.com/klinik/a/arti-berita-bohong-dan-menyesatkan-dalam-uu-ite-lt4eef8233871f5/
- Sudarto, D. P. W. dan. (2025). AKIBAT HUKUM BAGI PELAKU PENYEBARAN INFORMASI PALSU (HOAX) BERDASARKAN UU ITE. Lex Laguens: Jurnal Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan, 3(1), 45–59. https://jurnal.dokterlaw.com/index.php/lexlaguens
- Telkom Indonesia. (2026). Kedaulatan Data Bukan Isu Pemerintah Saja, Tapi Juga Perusahaan. https://www.telkom.co.id/. https://www.telkom.co.id/sites/berita/id_ID/article/kedaulatan-data-bukan-isu-pemerintah-saja-tapi-juga-perusahaan-347
- Willy Farianto. (2024). Kritik untuk PHK karena Pelanggaran Bersifat Mendesak. https://www.hukumonline.com/. https://www.hukumonline.com/berita/a/kritik-untuk-phk-karena-pelanggaran-bersifat-mendesak-lt65fac3b111ed4/
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.