Abject Objects: A Case for Using Humour and Horror in Design
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58477/dj.v4i1.327Keywords:
Product Design, Design Process, Body Horror, Abjection, Humour, Benign Violation TheoryAbstract
This paper explores the possibility of combining theories from different subject areas into product design as influences that are not typically seen in this space. The main aim of this research was to discover whether concepts from horror and comedy could be incorporated into a design process in order to create products that influence user reactions in new ways. While this paper only explores one example of incorporating new influences into a design process, it covers some of the key ideas in relation to wider exploration of concepts and how the ideas presented may work with other disciplinary themes. An exploration of user interactions with products in general was also key in understanding how this could affect the way users viewed and interacted with the final products. Finally, this paper proposes these ideas as a way to open new critiques on the design world and the influences used when designing new products. Building on research into horror and humour concepts, this paper explores the integration of these into a product design process. Walking through each stage of a design process drawing from academic perspectives on what makes a product design process successful. This paper demonstrates how a design process can be altered by introducing new influences while still meeting guidelines for what good design is. By then undertaking the design process and thus creating a suite of products demonstrating the concepts that were introduced, the paper determines that products designed with alternative influences can have a space in the design world and can function and interact with users in new ways. The implications of this research open possibilities of successfully using uncommon influences in product design as a way to open new understandings of what good design can be.
Downloads
References
Ambrose, G., & Harris, P. (2009). Design thinking. AVA Publishing. ProQuest Ebook Central. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/
Brown, T., & Kātz, B. (2019). Change by design: How design thinking transforms organizations and inspires innovation (Rev. and updated ed.). HarperBusiness.
Christensen, C., & Leslie, D. (2001). The innovator's dilemma [Audiobook]. HighBridge.
Cook, D. A. (2021). A history of three-dimensional cinema. Anthem Press. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/cardiffmet/detail.action?pq-origsite=primo&docID=6735093
Creed, B. (1993). The monstrous feminine: Film, feminism, psychoanalysis. Routledge.
Cross, N. (2011). Design thinking: Understanding how designers think and work. Berg Publishers.
Crothers, B. (2019). Product design vs. design thinking (1st ed.). O'Reilly Media.
Draven, D. (2013). Genre filmmaking. Routledge. https://learning.oreilly.com/library/view/genre-filmmaking/9780240824215/
Ferreira, A. (2017). Universal UX design: Building multicultural user experience (1st ed.). Morgan Kaufmann. https://learning.oreilly.com/library/view/universal-ux-design/9780128025956/
Fraser, M., & Greco, M. (Eds.). (2005). The body: A reader. Routledge.
Gillota, D. (2023). Dead funny: The humor of American horror. Rutgers University Press. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/cardiffmet/detail.action?docID=7236993&pq-origsite=primo
Green, T., & Labrecque, J. (2023). A guide to UX design and development: Developer's journey through the UX process (1st ed.). Apress. https://learning.oreilly.com/library/view/a-guide-to/9781484295762/
Haidt, J., Koller, S. H., & Dias, M. G. (1993). Affect, culture, and morality, or is it wrong to eat your dog? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65(4), 613–628. https://oce.ovid.com/article/00005205-199310000-00001/HTML
Haidt, J. (2007). The new synthesis in moral psychology. Science, 316(5827), 998–1002. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1137651
Heathcote, E. (2016, May 18). What is good design? A look at the many definitions of quality. FT.com. https://www.ft.com/
Hurley, M., Dennett, D., & Adams, R., Jr. (2011). Inside jokes: Using humour to reverse engineer the mind. MIT Press.
Hye-Knudsen, M. (2018). Painfully funny: Cringe comedy, benign masochism, and not-so-benign violations. Leviathan: Interdisciplinary Journal in English, (2), 13–31. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/324160892
Jajszczok, J. (2022). Hideous or hilarious? The European Journal of Humour Research, 10(1), 29–36.
Jones, D. A. (2018). Contents. In Gothic effigy (pp. 1–10). Manchester University Press. https://doi.org/10.7765/9781526101235.00004
Jones, W. M., & Askland, H. H. (2012). Design briefs: Is there a standard? Proceedings of the 24th Annual Conference of the Australasian Association for Engineering Education.
Kawin, B. F. (2012). Horror and the horror film. Anthem Press. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/cardiffmet/detail.action?pq-origsite=primo&docID=981587
Krippendorff, K. (2006). The semantic turn: A new foundation for design. CRC/Taylor & Francis.
Kristeva, J. (1982). Powers of horror: An essay in abjection. Columbia University Press.
Lovell, S. (2011). Dieter Rams: As little design as possible. Phaidon.
Luchs, M. G., Swan, S., & Griffin, A. (2015). Design thinking: New product development essentials from the PDMA. John Wiley & Sons. ProQuest Ebook Central.
Lukas, M., & Stiffler, C. (2024, July 29). An academic look at why things are funny: Benign Violation Theory with Dr. Caleb Warren [Audio podcast episode]. In The Funny Muscle Podcast. Apple Podcasts. https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/an-academic-look-at-why-things-are-funny-benign/id1727382805?i=1000663701670
Manente, S. (2023). Female bodies and posthumanism series: Abjection and the body as a liminal space. By Arcadia. https://www.byarcadia.org/post/female-bodies-and-posthumanism-101-abjection-and-the-body-as-a-liminal-space
Marks, T., & Porter, M. (2011). Good design: Deconstructing form and function and what makes good design work. Rockport Publishers.
McGraw, A. P., & Warren, C. (2010). Benign violations: Making immoral behavior funny. Psychological Science, 21(8), 1141–1149. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797610376073
McGraw, A. P., Warren, C., Williams, L. E., & Leonard, B. (2012). Too close for comfort, or too far to care? Finding humor in distant tragedies and close mishaps. Psychological Science, 23(10), 1215–1223. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797612443831
Miller, C. J., & Van, R. A. B. (Eds.). (2016). The laughing dead: The horror-comedy film from Bride of Frankenstein to Zombieland. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/cardiffmet/detail.action?pq-origsite=primo&docID=4503903
Morreall, J. (2020). The good, the bad, and the funny: An ethics of humor. Southern Journal of Philosophy, 58(4), 632–647. https://doi.org/10.1111/sjp.12390
Müller-Roterberg, C. (2019). Design thinking for dummies. John Wiley & Sons.
Paul, W. (1994). Laughing screaming: Modern Hollywood horror and comedy. Columbia University Press.
Prochner, I. (2025). Call to move beyond Dieter Rams' ten principles of good design. Design and Culture, 17(2), 225–235. https://doi.org/10.1080/17547075.2025.2488565
Rosengarten, R. (2022). Second chance: My life in things. Open Book Publishers. https://doi.org/10.11647/OBP.0285
Ruff, F. J. (2008). The laugh factory?: Humor and horror at Le Théâtre du Grand Guignol. Theatre Symposium, 16, 65–74. https://www.proquest.com/docview/214148415
Sandler, L. H. (2025). Universal principles of storytelling for designers. Rockport Publishers.
ScreamWorks blurs line between theatre and reality with its brand-new immersive horror experience - BLOODBATH 2022. (2022). ProQuest. https://www.proquest.com/docview/2717660560
Shildrick, M. (2002). Embodying the monster: Encounters with the vulnerable self. Sage Publications.
Smuts, A. (2010). The ethics of humor: Can your sense of humor be wrong? Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 13(3), 333–347. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10677-009-9203-5
Stallybrass, P., & White, A. (1986). The politics and poetics of transgression. Cornell University Press.
St Laurent, L. (2022). Re-Animator. Velvet Light Trap, (90), 84–86. https://www.proquest.com/docview/2881480942
Terstiege, G. (Ed.). (2009). The making of design: From the first model to the final product. Walter de Gruyter GmbH. ProQuest Ebook Central.
Unger, R., & Chandler, C. (2023). A project guide to UX design: For user experience designers in the field or in the making (3rd ed.). New Riders. https://learning.oreilly.com/library/view/a-project-guide/9780321603685/
Veatch, T. C. (1998). A theory of humor. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research, 11(2), 161–215. https://teaclub.e-lub.net/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/veatch.pdf
Volynsky, A. (2008). Ballet's magic kingdom: Selected writings on dance in Russia, 1911–1925. Yale University Press. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/cardiffmet/detail.action?docID=3420504&pq-origsite=primo
Warren, C., & McGraw, A. P. (2015). Benign Violation Theory. Mays Business School Research Paper No. 2015-11. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2559414
Worland, R. (2025). The horror film: An introduction (2nd ed.). John Wiley & Sons. https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=_O4YEQAAQBAJ.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Design Journal
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.